|
The New York Times
OPINION
Alan (Not Atlas)
Shrugged
By MAUREEN DOWD,
OP-ED COLUMNIST, nytimes.com September 19, 2007
WASHINGTON -- It’s a lost art,
slinking away.
Now the fashion is slinking back.
Nobody wants to simply admit they made a mistake and disappear for awhile.
Nobody even wants to use the weasel words: “Mistakes were made.” No, far better
to pop right back up and get in the face of those who were savoring your
absence.
| |
 |
| |
Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times
Maureen
Dowd |
We should think of a name for this
appalling modern phenomenon. Kissingering, perhaps.
In Las Vegas, there’s the loathsome O.J., a proper candidate for shunning and
stun-gunning, barging back into the picture.
And on Capitol Hill, Larry Craig shocked mortified Republicans by bounding into
their weekly lunch. You’d think the conservative 62-year-old Idaho senator
would have some shame, going from fervently opposing gay rights to provocatively
tapping his toe in a Minneapolis airport toilet. (The toilet stall, now
known as the Larry Craig bathroom, has become a hot local tourist attraction.)
But no.
As though Republicans don’t have
enough problems, Mr. Craig said he is ready to go back to work while the legal
hotshots he hired appeal his case. He even cast a couple votes, one
against D.C. voting rights. (This creep gets to decide about my
representation?)
Even if President Bush is “the cockiest guy” around, as the former Mexican
President Vicente Fox writes in a new memoir critical of W.’s
“grade-school-level” Spanish and his grade-school-level Iraq policy, he can’t be
feeling good about the barbs being hurled his way by former supporters and
enablers.
Rummy’s back in the news, giving interviews about a planned memoir and
foundation designed to encourage “reasoned and civil debate” about global
challenges and to spur more young people to go into government.
It’s rich. Maybe more young people would go into government if they didn’t
have to work for devious bullies like Rummy who make huge life-and-death
mistakes and then don’t apologize.
In The Washington Post, he blamed the press and Congress for creating an
inhospitable atmosphere that drives good people away from public service.
Maybe that’s why he and his evil twin, Dick Cheney, did their best to undermine
the constitutional system of checks and balances so they could get more fine
young people to serve.
Does the man blamed for creating civil disorder in Iraq even know what the word
“civil” means? Wasn’t he the prickly Pentagon chief who got furious with
anyone who didn’t agree with him on “global challenges”?
He shoved Gen. Eric Shinseki into retirement — and failed to show up at his
retirement party — after the good general correctly told Congress that it would
take several hundred thousand troops to invade and control Iraq. And he
snubbed the German defense minister when Germany joined the Coalition of the
Unwilling.
Interviewed by GQ’s Lisa DePaulo on his ranch in Taos, N.M., with another mule
named Gus nearby, the “75-year-old package of waning testosterone,” as the
writer called him, was asked if he misses W. Offering a wry smile, he
replied, “Um, no.”
He now treats the son with the same contempt he treated the father with, which
is why it’s so odd that the son hired his dad’s nemesis in the first place.
He actually had the gall to imply to Ms. DePaulo that he was out of the loop on
Iraq and dragged out a copy of a memo he had written outlining all the things
that could go wrong.
In fact, he was the one, right after 9/11, who began pushing to go after Saddam.
He and Cheney were orchestrating the invasion from the start, guiding the
dauphin with warnings about how weak he would seem if he let Saddam mock him.
The ultimate bureaucratic infighter wrote the memo as part of his Socratic
strategy, asking a lot of questions when he was already pushing to go into Iraq.
He never did any contingency planning in case those things went wrong; the memo
was there simply so that someday he could pull it out for a reporter.
In the same issue of GQ, Colin Powell tried to build up the objections he made
to the president, too, in an interview with Walter Isaacson. But nobody’s
buying.
Even though he rubber-stamped W.’s tax cuts, Alan Greenspan is now upbraiding
the president and vice president for profligate spending and putting politics
ahead of sound economics.
He also says in his new memoir that “the Iraq war is largely about oil,” telling
Bob Woodward that he had privately told W. and Cheney that ousting Saddam was
“essential” to keeping world oil supplies safe.
Irrational exuberance, indeed.
|
