|
|
Stringer's reward comes at a price
EDITORIAL, Home News Tribune Online (thnt.com) April 26, 2007
Stringer is guaranteed $450,000 a year. Annual incentives push her total compensation to approximately $900,000 a year. The deal makes Stringer one of the highest-paid women's basketball coaches in the nation. Even more significant, her compensation now dwarfs that paid out to a host of male counterparts who head up men's programs, including her Scarlet Knights stablemate Fred Hill, who takes home $358,000 annually, a paltry sum next to the riches Stringer is about to collect.
Did Stringer earn the nearly $1 million payday? By the standards of today's college basketball marketplace, yes. A 27-9 season and trip to the nation championship game, on top of a string of similar successes in recent seasons, place Stringer firmly at the top of her profession. Like the CEO pay at a Microsoft or AT&T, that huge chunk of change goes with the territory — like it or not.
Even so, Stringer's newfound wealth and the contract windfall bestowed upon Schiano one year ago are stomach-churning stuff for those spectators who sit on the academic side of the field.
It bears repeating yet one more
time that
For all of that generosity — funded with taxpayer loot we might add — one must think football rakes in the big bucks. Hardly. Rather, it's still a gigantic money-loser. So are both the men's and ladies basketball programs. Altogether, they cost the state multiple millions every year.
How is it possible to justify
spending so much on so few while so many on the sidelines suffer?
Stringer's contract is one more reminder of that question and the puzzle it
presents for |
Send mail to
email@gaypasg.org with questions or comments about this web site.
|