Records Show Tenet
Briefed Rice
on Al Qaeda Threat
By PHILIP SHENON and
MARK MAZZETTI, no the Web, October 2, 2006
JIDDA, Saudi Arabia, -- A
review of White House records has determined that George J. Tenet, then the
director of central intelligence, did brief Condoleezza Rice and other top
officials on July 10, 2001, about the looming threat from Al Qaeda, a State
Department spokesman said Monday.
The account by Sean McCormack came hours after Ms. Rice, the secretary of state,
told reporters aboard her airplane that she did not recall the specific meeting
on July 10, 2001, noting that she had met repeatedly with Mr. Tenet that summer
about terrorist threats. Ms. Rice, the national security adviser at the
time, said it was “incomprehensible” she ignored dire terrorist threats two
months before the Sept. 11 attacks.
Mr. McCormack also said records show that the Sept. 11 commission was informed
about the meeting, a fact that former intelligence officials and members of the
commission confirmed on Monday.
When details of the meeting emerged last week in a new book by Bob Woodward of
The Washington Post, Bush administration officials questioned Mr. Woodward’s
reporting.
Now, after several days, both current and former Bush administration officials
have confirmed parts of Mr. Woodward’s account.
Officials now agree that on July 10, 2001, Mr. Tenet and his counterterrorism
deputy, J. Cofer Black, were so alarmed about an impending Al Qaeda attack that
they demanded an emergency meeting at the White House with Ms. Rice and her
National Security Council staff.
According to two former intelligence officials, Mr. Tenet told those assembled
at the White House about the growing body of intelligence the Central
Intelligence Agency had collected pointing to an impending Al Qaeda attack.
But both current and former officials took issue with Mr. Woodward’s account
that Mr. Tenet and his aides left the meeting in frustration, feeling as if Ms.
Rice had ignored them.
Mr. Tenet told members of the Sept. 11 commission about the July 10 meeting when
they interviewed him in early 2004, but committee members said the former C.I.A.
director never indicated he had left the White House with the impression that he
had been ignored.
“Tenet never told us that he was brushed off,” said Richard Ben-Veniste, a
Democratic member of the commission. “We certainly would have followed
that up.”
Mr. McCormack said the records showed that, far from ignoring Mr. Tenet’s
warnings, Ms. Rice acted on the intelligence and requested that Mr. Tenet make
the same presentation to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Atttorney
General John Ashcroft.
But Mr. Ashcroft said by telephone on Monday evening that he never received a
briefing that summer from Mr. Tenet.
“Frankly, I’m disappointed that I didn’t get that kind of briefing,” he said.
“I’m surprised he didn’t think it was important enough to come by and tell me.”
The dispute that has played out in recent days gives further evidence of an
escalating battle between the White House and Mr. Tenet over who should take the
blame for such mistakes as the failure to stop the Sept. 11 attacks and
assertions by Bush administration officials that Saddam Hussein was stockpiling
chemical and biological weapons and cultivating ties to Al Qaeda.
Mr. Tenet resigned as director of central intelligence in the summer of 2004 and
was honored that December with a Presidential Medal of Freedom during a White
House ceremony. Since leaving the C.I.A., Mr. Tenet has stayed out of the
public eye, largely declining to defend his record at the C.I.A. even after
several government investigations have assailed the faulty intelligence that
helped build the case for the Iraq war.
Mr. Tenet is now completing work on a memoir that is scheduled to be published
early next year.
It is unclear how much Mr. Tenet will use the book to settle old scores,
although recent books have portrayed Mr. Tenet both as dubious about the need
for the Iraq war and angry that the White House has made the C.I.A. the primary
scapegoat for the war.
In his book “The One Percent Doctrine,” the journalist and author Ron Suskind
quotes Mr. Tenet’s former deputy at the C.I.A., John McLaughlin, saying that Mr.
Tenet “wishes he could give that damn medal back.”
In his own book, Mr. Woodward wrote that over time Mr. Tenet developed a
particular dislike for Ms. Rice, and that the former C.I.A. director was furious
when she publicly blamed the agency for allowing President Bush to make the
false claim in the 2003 State of the Union Address that Saddam Hussein was
pursuing nuclear materials in Niger .
“If the C.I.A., the Director of National Intelligence, had said ‘take this out
of the speech,’ it would have been gone, without question,” Ms. Rice told
reporters in July 2003.
In fact, the C.I.A. had told the White House months before that the Niger
intelligence was bogus and had managed to keep the claim out of an October 2002
speech that President Bush gave in Cincinnati.
More recently, Mr. Tenet has told friends that he was particularly angry when,
appearing recently on Sunday talk shows, both Ms. Rice and Vice President Dick
Cheney cited Mr. Tenet by name as the reason that Bush administration officials
asserted that Mr. Hussein had stockpiles of banned weapons in Iraq and ties to
Al Qaeda.
Mr. Cheney recalled during an appearance on “Meet the Press” on Sept. 10 of this
year: “George Tenet sat in the Oval Office and the president of the United
States asked him directly, he said, ‘George, how good is the case against Saddam
on weapons of mass destruction?’ the director of the C.I.A. said, ‘It’s a slam
dunk, Mr. President, it’s a slam dunk.’ ”
Philip Shenon reported from Jidda, Saudi Arabia, and Mark
Mazzetti from Washington .
|
