Are gay adoptions
shaping up
as nation's next
culture clash?
Move to place
children only with heterosexual couples
gains some ground,
but many doubt it will succeed
By Bonnie Miller
Rubin, chicagotribune.com from the Web, March 20, 2006
Like any new parents, Steve McDonagh
and Daniel Smith eagerly brag about the unique talents of their 8-month-old son.
"He loves swimming," McDonagh joked. "He's a great sleeper and a champion
pooper," Smith added.
The men, who live in Rogers Park, have been together for the last decade.
In their early 40s and with a successful restaurant and catering business, they
felt ready for fatherhood.
On July 9 Nate entered the world, and his birthparents, working with the Cradle
in Evanston, chose McDonagh and Smith to adopt him.
"We were very lucky," Smith said. "Everyone--including our families--was
very supportive."
Not everyone views their domestic situation so benevolently. In recent
weeks a flurry of activity has focused new attention on same-sex adoption, which
is being touted as the next battleground in the nation's culture wars.
Some states, including Ohio, are considering legislation to bar gays from
adopting. When local church officials ordered Catholic Charities of Boston
to stop placing children in same-sex households, the agency decided earlier this
month to get out of the adoption business entirely.
Critics of gay adoption say children are damaged by growing up in such
households. But many child-welfare advocates disagree, saying that if gay
couples are ruled out as adoptive parents, it means children who desperately
need homes will have that much longer to wait.
Catholic Charities in San Francisco is "reviewing its adoption program to
determine how we can continue to best serve the interests of these vulnerable
children," said Brian Cahill, a spokesman for the agency, which has placed five
children out of 136 adoptions in same-sex homes in the last five years.
In 2003 the Vatican called the practice "gravely immoral."
"The teachings of the church are paramount, but equally paramount are the needs
of these kids," said Cahill, adding that 60 percent wait two years before
finding a home. "Managing the tension of those two goals is a challenge."
At Catholic Charities of Chicago -- which facilitates the adoption of children
in foster care under contract with the Illinois Department of Children and
Family Services -- the issue is not being discussed, according to spokeswoman
April Specht.
The agency makes placements based on the best interests of the child, DCFS'
licensing standards and other state laws, Specht said in a statement. In
Illinois, prospective foster and adoptive parents can be either single
individuals or married couples, and Specht declined to say whether singles would
be approved if they were in a same-sex relationship.
The state does not know the sexual orientations involved in the 200 adoptions in
the last year that Catholic Charities facilitated for children who were wards of
the state, said Diane Jackson of DCFS.
"We absolutely have a non-discriminatory policy, so that is information that we
don't document, inquire about, track or judge," she said. "Our focus is
permanency ... and whatever home is safe, loving and nurturing."
State laws are mixed-bag
Many Americans, Catholic and otherwise, are opposed to placing children in gay
households. Social conservatives hope the issue will rally voters in the
same way that same-sex marriage brought them to the polls in 2004.
"We are paying attention to this in the larger context of the gay-marriage
debate," said Charmaine Yoest of the Family Research Council, a conservative
advocacy group. "We see it as all one piece that is interconnected."
Nationwide, laws on the issue are a hodgepodge. Florida has long banned
gay adoption, though such couples can be foster parents. In Utah, only
heterosexual, married couples can adopt, excluding not just gays but single
people -- who are allowed to adopt in virtually every other state.
Mississippi nixes gay couples but not gay singles. Last month in Ohio, a
bill was introduced that would bar homosexuals from adopting or being foster
parents.
About 520,000 children are in foster care, according to the North American
Council on Adoptable Children. Of those, 120,000 are available for
adoption, but only 50,000 find permanent homes each year. In Illinois,
some 2,220 children are waiting to be adopted. Experts say gay people take
in some of the most hard-to-place children -- those who are older or have
mental, emotional or physical disabilities.
Mary Anne Hackett, president of the Concerned Catholics of Illinois, a
conservative organization, asserts that children suffer long-term "damage" in
such placements.
"Children do best with a mother and a father. ... Kids would be better off in
foster care than with a homosexual couple," she said.
A tough sell?
But John Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont McKenna College in
California, thinks that will be a tough sell to the electorate.
"The crucial difference between gay marriage and gay adoption is that only one
redefined marriage," Pitney said. "But we already have a number of single
people adopting children, so it's not really parallel.
"The question: Is it better for a child to find a home with a gay couple
than not finding a home at all? If it's framed that way, I think it will
be very difficult for proponents [of anti-gay measures] to gain traction.
But if it rests on religious liberty, that will be a different issue."
In recent years, adoption agencies with Jewish or Lutheran ties have welcomed
gay and lesbian applicants.
"I can't even tell you when we started," said Lynn Goffinet, statewide director
of adoption for Lutheran Social Services of Illinois. "Probably before we
knew it."
The Cradle, a non-sectarian agency, has placed 15 children with gay parents --
including McDonagh and Smith -- since 2003, according to its president, Julie
Tye. The board approved such placements after studying research.
Groups such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Child Welfare League
of America have come out with research saying children do not suffer any adverse
effects.
All agree there is no such thing as an ideal environment. For children
with behavior disorders, the best match may be a single mother or father because
the child cannot pit one parent against the other, said Goffinet, a veteran of
40 years in the field. For a biracial child, a gay couple might bring a
"heightened awareness of what it means to be different," Tye said.
"They also haven't been torn up emotionally by the infertility industry," she
said. "By the time heterosexual couples come to us, they've already
experienced so many losses."
Acceptance appears to be rising
Sixty percent of adoption agencies now work with gays and lesbians, and the
number of such families is growing steadily, according to a 2003 study of
same-sex adoptions conducted by the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, a New
York-based research and advocacy group.
But Adam Pertman, the group's executive director, warns against painting
Catholic Charities in Boston "as a bunch of homophobes." The fact that the
agency formerly approved such adoptions -- placing 13 children out of 720
adoptions in gay homes since 1987, according to the Boston Globe -- is
indicative of the issue's growing acceptance.
"I hope they find a way to resolve this ... because anything that deprives kids
of potential parents is a real downer to say the least," Pertman said.
Any initiatives that would bar gays and lesbians from adopting would not keep
them from parenting, because they already have children through surrogacy and
in-vitro fertilization, he added.
"So really, who does this serve?" Pertman said.
As the rhetorical battle is waged in churches and in the political arena,
McDonagh and Smith don't have much time to take a stance. They're too busy
working (they also have a show, "Party Line With the Hearty Boys," on the Food
Network) and doting on Nate to get involved.
"We really don't encounter a lot of prejudice," Smith said. "We just have
a lot of fun."
brubin@tribune.com
|
