G.O.P.'s Bid for
Blacks Falters
 |
|
Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
Julian Bond, chairman of the N.A.A.C.P., addressing
an early session of the group’s convention Monday in Washington.
President Bush, who has had strained relations with the group, may
address it later. |
By ADAM NAGOURNEY,
NYTimes on the Web, July 18, 2006
WASHINGTON, July 17 — Even for
some Republicans, the notion was hard to take at face value: the
Republican Party would make an explicit play for black votes, a strike at the
Democratic base and a part of a larger White House plan to achieve long-term
Republican dominance.
Starting after President Bush’s re-election in 2004, the party chairman, Ken
Mehlman, filled his schedule with appearances before black audiences. He
apologized for what he described as the racially polarized politics of some
Republicans over the past 25 years. And the White House, in pressing
issues like same-sex marriage to appeal to social conservatives, was also hoping
to gain support among churchgoing African-Americans.
There has been no end to speculation about what the party was up to. Was
it simply a ploy to improve the party’s image with moderate white voters?
Did the White House see an opportunity to make small though significant changes
in the American political system by pulling even a relative few black voters
into its corner in important states like Ohio? (Yes, and yes.)
But as Mr. Bush is tentatively scheduled to speak at the N.A.A.C.P. convention
in Washington this week — after five years of declining to appear before an
organization with which he has had tense relations — it seems fair to say that
whatever the motivation, the effort has faltered.
Mr. Mehlman’s much-publicized apology to the National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People seems to have done little to address the
resentment that built up over what civil rights leaders view as decades of
racial politics practiced or countenanced by Republicans. One example they
point to is the first President Bush’s use of the escape of Willie Horton, a
black convicted murderer, to portray his Democratic opponent in the 1988
election, Michael S. Dukakis, as soft on crime.
That perception of Republicans as insensitive to racial issues was fed again by
the opposition mounted by some House conservatives to an extension of the Voting
Rights Act. The House approved the extension last week.
“I have heard Ken Mehlman talk about the Republican Party as the party of
Lincoln,” said Bruce S. Gordon, the president of the N.A.A.C.P. “I have
not seen that evidence itself as much as Ken would suggest. If the party
wishes to reflect the principles of Lincoln, it has a long way to go.”
Coming as the immigration fight on Capitol Hill has undercut Republican efforts
to appeal to Hispanic voters, the disappointing results of the outreach to black
voters is bad news for a White House that once viewed the 2002 and 2004
elections as a platform to achieve a long-term shift in the balance of power
between the two parties. Forcing Democrats to fight to hold on to black
voters and Hispanic voters was a crucial part of that strategy.
“I take my hat off to Ken; what he has done is unprecedented in the time I’ve
been a Republican,” said J. C. Watts Jr., a former congressman from Oklahoma,
who is black. “However, I remain unconvinced that it is in the DNA of our
party to get it done. There are just too many things out there that I
think Americans of African descent have concerns about.”
Senator Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois, who attended Harvard Law School with
Mr. Mehlman and who is black, said: “Ken was sincere in wanting to reach
out to the African-American community, and it would be a healthy thing if both
parties actively competed for the African-American vote. Unfortunately,
the agenda of the Republican Party keeps getting in the way of that outreach.”
For all the emphasis that Mr. Mehlman has put on this drive, Mr. Bush — who is
highly unpopular among blacks — has not made this effort a public priority of
his administration, though Mr. Mehlman said the president shared his desire to
expand the party’s appeal to blacks.
In an interview, Mr. Mehlman played down the effect of the delay in approving
the extension to the Voting Rights Act. He noted that the party had black
candidates running in statewide races in four states this fall, and that he
always viewed the effort as a long and steady climb.
“As I said from the day I started this,’’ Mr. Mehlman said, “there are going to
be ups and there are going to be downs — this is going to be a difficult
process. It took the Republican Party 40 years, since 1964, to get 8
percent of the vote.”
He argued that Republican advocacy of economic policies that would give more
power to individuals rather than to government — like health saving accounts —
would appeal to middle-class black voters as much as it would to whites.
“What we have today that we had less of 10 years ago is a strong and powerful
message,’’ Mr. Mehlman said, “and we have candidates.”
Lynn Swann, an African-American Republican running for governor in Pennsylvania,
argued that his own candidacy showed the extent to which the Republican Party
was becoming more diverse and that the debate about the Voting Rights Act
extension did not distract from that.
“I don’t think it undercuts it — people make mistakes,” Mr. Swann said. “I
think of Senator Al Gore Sr., who is on record for one of the longest
filibusters against the Civil Rights Act when it was first initiated. And
he’s a Democrat.”
Whether the Republican effort ever had much of a chance is open to debate.
Donna Brazile, a prominent black Democratic strategist, initially warned
Democrats to take Mr. Mehlman’s efforts seriously, but Ms. Brazile said last
week that any progress he and the White House had been making ended with the
administration’s response to Hurricane Katrina last year.
“He was on a roll, but Katrina stopped him in his tracks,” Ms. Brazile said of
Mr. Mehlman. “They are eager to tap into the political support of the
African-American community, but they don’t have any legs to stand on.”
The central problem for Republicans is that Mr. Mehlman’s very visible effort to
reach out to African-Americans ran into the wall of historical trends that had
pushed blacks toward the Democratic Party and Republicans more to the right.
“You have someone stand up one day and say, ‘We’re going to make a major
outreach to African-American voters,’ and the next day, you pull the Voting
Rights Act from the floor,” said Representative Melvin Watt, Democrat of North
Carolina and chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus.
As evidence of what has become one of the hallmark initiatives of Mr. Mehlman’s
chairmanship, his office said he had made 48 visits to African-American
audiences since becoming chairman in January 2005. At the same time,
Republican strategists have appealed to socially conservative blacks by
emphasizing social issues like same-sex marriage.
Mr. Watts, the former Republican congressman, called that a “lame strategy” and
said the top concerns of African-American voters were racial and economic
issues.
“It’s a little bit insulting to all those pastors out there and people who stand
with the party on the social issues,’’ Mr. Watts said, when the party then does
“nothing” to help blacks on opportunity issues.
David A. Bositis, senior political analyst with the Joint Center for Political
and Economic Studies, a nonpartisan Washington group that studies black issues,
said of the Republican effort: “They haven’t had any success. But I
thought all along it was never going to be realistic.”
|
