Roberts
Overwhelmingly Approved
as Next Chief Justice
By DAVID STOUT,
NYTimes on the Web, September 29, 2005
WASHINGTON, Sept. 29 -- Judge
John G. Roberts Jr. was confirmed as the 17th chief justice of the United States
today in a formality that intensified speculation over who will be President
Bush's next Supreme Court nominee.
The Senate confirmed Judge Roberts by a vote of 78 to 22, with unanimous support
from Republicans and with many Democrats voting for him as well. Judge
Roberts was to be sworn in at the White House this afternoon by Supreme Court
Justice John Paul Stevens amid expectations that the president will announce his
next choice for the court very soon.
There has been widespread speculation that Mr. Bush will tap a woman or a member
of a minority group. The president encouraged such speculation early this
week when he commented on the need for diversity on the court. No one will
be surprised if the president nominates a Hispanic, since there has never been
one on the high court.
The new chief justice will preside over the Supreme Court term that begins on
Monday, and in all likelihood over many terms thereafter, since he is only 50
years old. In moving up from the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit, John Roberts will succeed Chief Justice William H.
Rehnquist, for whom he was once a law clerk.
Judge Roberts and his wife, Jane, a lawyer, had lunch with President Bush at the
White House today before the swearing-in. The judge watched the Senate
vote from the Roosevelt Room of the White House.
Judge Roberts was originally nominated to succeed the retiring Justice Sandra
Day O'Connor. But with the death of Chief Justice Rehnquist on Sept. 3,
President Bush renominated Judge Roberts to be chief -- leaving Justice
O'Connor's post unfilled. She has said she will stay on the court until
her successor is confirmed.
"With the confirmation of John Roberts, the Supreme Court will embark upon a new
era in its history, the Roberts era," Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee, the
Republican majority leader, said before the vote. "For many years to come,
long after many of us have left public service, the Roberts court will be
deliberating on some of the most difficult and fundamental questions of U.S.
law." Those issues include abortion and assisted suicide, issues that
caused his Democratic opponents to view him with suspicion. During
hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Democrats pressed him on those
topics and on whether his views on civil rights and women's rights had changed
since his days as a young lawyer in the Reagan administration. The judge
told his questioners that his Catholic faith would not determine how he rules on
matters of law.
The Democrats who opposed Judge Roberts said he had not been frank enough during
the hearings and had been downright evasive at times. Senator Edward M.
Kennedy of Massachusetts, a member of the Judiciary Committee, was a leading
opponent.
"I hope I am proved wrong about John Roberts," Mr. Kennedy said today. "I
have been proved wrong before on my confirmation votes."
Even the judge's critics have conceded his intellectual brilliance and his
accomplishments as a lawyer. And after the Judiciary Committee endorsed
Judge Roberts, 13 to 5, one week ago, with three of the panel's eight Democrats
backing him, any suspense about the nomination evaporated.
Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic minority leader and an opponent of
Judge Roberts, said before the vote that he had not tried to twist the arms of
any Democrats. "They will vote their conscience," he said.
Twenty-two Democrats voted for Judge Roberts today, and 22 voted against him.
The Senate's lone independent, James Jeffords of Vermont, voted in favor.
Vermont's other senator, Patrick J. Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary
Committee, voted for confirmation.
Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York and a member of the Judiciary
Committee, said he hoped that his opposition would turn out to be a mistake.
"I decided that while there was a very good chance that Judge Roberts would be a
mainstream, very conservative but mainstream justice without an ideological
agenda, that he was not convincing enough," Mr. Schumer said.
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Democrat of New York, also voted no. So
did Senators Jon Corzine and Frank Lautenberg, Democrats of New Jersey.
Senators Joseph I. Lieberman and Christopher Dodd, Democrats from Connecticut,
voted for the nominee.
Democrats who opposed Judge Roberts made it clear early on that they would not
try to block his confirmation through parliamentary moves. But they have
signaled that they will consider such tactics if Mr. Bush nominates someone whom
they consider a conservative ideologue.
"The curtain is about to rise on the nomination of a replacement for Justice
Sandra Day O'Connor," Mr. Schumer said. "If ever there was a time that
cried out for consensus, the time is now."
(Emphasis Added)
|
