Canada expected to
pass bill approving same-sex marriage
U.S. neighbor would
become the third country to do so
Wyatt Buchanan,
SFGate.com from the Web, June 16, 2005
Canada is on track toward becoming
the largest country yet to legalize same-sex marriage, after its ruling Liberal
government survived four no-confidence votes this week.
It could join the Netherlands and Belgium by next week as the third country to
allow two people to marry regardless of gender.
Action on a bill now nearing passage in the House of Commons that defines
marriage as "the lawful union of two persons to the exclusion of all others"
could have been significantly delayed had the Liberals lost any of Tuesday's
late-night votes, because that would have triggered formation of a new
Parliament. If Parliament doesn't pass the Civil Marriage Law before it
leaves for summer recess next Thursday, action will be put off until fall.
"The chances of this bill being passed into law are very good, if not excellent,
and the government is squarely committed to seeing it through," Steve MacKinnon,
national director of the ruling Liberal Party of Canada, said Tuesday.
Court decisions over the past two years have made same-sex marriages legal in
one territory and seven provinces, which together hold 90 percent of Canada's
population. The Canadian military performed its first same-sex wedding in
May. Parliament's approval would make same-sex marriage available for all
33 million residents across Canada.
Canada does not keep national marriage statistics, but British Columbia's
Ministry of Health Services reports that the province has issued just under
2,000 marriage licenses to same-sex couples since July 2003. This year,
266 Americans have married there, including 53 Californians.
These developments provide sharp contrast to the United States, where Congress
has debated a Constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.
California gay rights groups say Canada sanctioning gay marriage will have more
symbolic than legal or practical effect on American lesbians, gays, bisexuals
and transgender people.
"It has had a tremendously positive impact on the LGBT community here," said
Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights in San
Francisco. "It has been very encouraging to see marriage equality gained
in Canada. It's renewed the determination to see marriage equality gained
here."
The president of the Human Rights Campaign in Washington, D.C., the largest gay
and lesbian organization in the United States, said developments in Canada
provide important lessons.
"I think if you look at what has happened in Canada generally, you see the same
kinds of things you see in Massachusetts, which are that Canada is still there,
life goes on," said John Solomonese. "It hasn't broken away from the
continent."
If Parliament passes the Civil Marriage Law, the remaining five provinces and
territories in Canada will have to issue a marriage license to any couple that
requests one.
"For all intents and purposes, it settles the issue," said Alex Munter, national
coordinator for the group Canadians for Equal Marriage. "Once the law is
passed, it becomes extremely difficult legally to turn back the clock."
Religious groups in Canada and the opposition Conservative party have fought the
bill and remain optimistic they will defeat it.
"I believe that we still have a credible chance of stopping this legislation,"
said K-John Cheung of Defend Marriage British Columbia, which is part of a
national coalition of religious and conservative groups.
Pat O'Brien, a member of Parliament who quit the Liberal party last week over
the same-sex marriage bill, gave opponents new hope Tuesday afternoon when he
promised to vote against the government in the confidence votes if the bill was
not delayed until fall. But O'Brien's stepped-up opposition was not enough
to bring down the government.
The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops wrote Prime Minister Paul Martin
last week saying the legislation was rushed and could challenge basic freedoms
of conscience and religion.
Martin gave a forceful speech in support for same-sex marriage when the
legislation was introduced in February, saying he wanted all the people of his
country to be treated as "equals under the law."
"The rights of Canadians who belong to a minority group must always be protected
by virtue of their status as citizens, regardless of their numbers," Martin told
Parliament then. "These rights must never be left vulnerable to the
impulses of the majority. We embrace freedom and equality in theory, Mr.
Speaker. We must also embrace them in fact."
The legislation arose after an appeals court in Ontario struck down restrictions
on marriage in June 2003, followed by courts in British Columbia, Quebec,
Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, and the Yukon
Territory.
After the Ontario ruling, the government decided to drop its appeals and instead
formulate legislation to make same-sex marriage legal nationwide. The bill
is now under review by a legislative committee. When it leaves the
committee, it will go for a third vote in the House of Commons and then to the
Senate, where it also is expected to pass.
Californians may marry in Canada, but Proposition 22, passed by 61 percent of
voters in 2000, prevents the state from recognizing same-sex marriages --
performed here, in Canada or elsewhere. A San Francisco judge ruled
California's same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional this spring. The state
appealed that decision, and a hearing is set for fall.
Groups that oppose same-sex marriage in the United States said action by Canada
could strengthen the resolve to ban same-sex marriage here.
"I think if anything, it will increase the alarm that most Americans feel over
the prospect of same-sex marriage and thereby strengthen the campaigns for state
and federal marriage amendments," said Peter Sprigg, vice president of policy
for the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C.
Americans might even ignore Canada.
"We have a great momentum that is apart and unaffected by what happens in Canada
or other countries," said Carrie Gordon Earll, spokeswoman for Focus on the
Family, based in Colorado. "We didn't follow Canada when it came to
national health care policy or on a number of social issues."
The move toward a same-sex marriage
law
1999: Canadian Supreme Court rules that same-sex couples are
covered by common law. Parliament provides for "survivor" entitlements for
partners in same-sex couples who receive government benefits. Quebec's
provincial legislatures unanimously adopt legislation amending the definition of
spouses to include same-sex couples.
2001: Netherlands is first country to legalize same-sex marriage.
2002: Provincial courts in Ontario and Quebec rule that limiting
marriage to opposite-sex couples violates the national Charter. The
Canadian government appeals both cases.
2003: British Columbia court rules opposite-sex marriage
restriction violates the Charter. Belgium legalizes same-sex marriage.
Ontario court orders provincial authorities to accept redefinition of marriage.
Canadian government accepts provincial rulings and begins legislative process to
permit same-sex marriage. Parliament votes 137-132 not to reserve marriage
to heterosexuals.
2004: San Francisco officials marry same-sex couples for a month
until stopped by court order. Massachusetts begins marrying same-sex
couples. Yukon Territory and the Canadian provinces of Nova Scotia,
Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Newfoundland and Labrador legalize a range of types
of same-sex unions.
Feb. 1, 2005: The Civil Marriage Law is introduced in Canadian Congress.
Known as Bill C-38, it provides Canada's first national definition of marriage,
as "the lawful union of two persons to the exclusion of all others." The law
does not address government benefits or religious marriage.
May 5, 2005: Amid political debate, a legislative committee begins
considering Bill C-38.
Today: Committee plans to report to Parliament on the bill, moving
it toward a vote by full Congress.
June 23: If the Canadian Senate doesn't act on the bill by next
Thursday, it will hold over until autumn.
Source: Analysis of Bill C-38 by Parliament's law and government division.
Same-sex marriage laws in Canada:
Currently, seven Canadian provinces — including the three most populous — and
one territory can legally issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
By province:
| Legal since |
|
Province |
2004 population |
| June 10, 2003 |
|
Ontario |
12,392,700 |
| July 8, 2003 |
|
British Columbia |
4,196,400 |
| March 19, 2004 |
|
Quebec |
7,542,800 |
| July 14, 2004 |
|
Yukon Territory |
31,200 |
| Sept. 16, 2004 |
|
Manitoba |
1,170,300 |
| Sept. 24, 2004 |
|
Nova Scotia |
937,000 |
| Nov. 5, 2004 |
|
Saskatchewan |
995,400 |
| Dec. 21, 2004 |
|
Newfoundland and Labrador |
517,000 |
|
Provinces that do not issue licenses to same-sex couples: |
| |
|
Alberta |
3,210,900 |
| |
|
New Brunswick |
751,400 |
| |
|
Prince Edward Island |
137,900 |
| |
|
Nunavut |
29,600 |
| |
|
Northwest Territories |
42,800 |
Sources: Answers.com,
Statistics Canada
Todd Trumbull / The Chronicle
|