Teaching of
Creationism Is Endorsed in New Survey
By LAURIE GOODSTEIN,
NYTimes on the Web, August 31, 2005
In a finding that is likely to
intensify the debate over what to teach students about the origins of life, a
poll released yesterday found that nearly two-thirds of Americans say that
creationism should be taught alongside evolution in public schools.
The poll found that 42 percent of respondents held strict creationist views,
agreeing that "living things have existed in their present form since the
beginning of time."
In contrast, 48 percent said they believed that humans had evolved over time.
But of those, 18 percent said that evolution was "guided by a supreme being,"
and 26 percent said that evolution occurred through natural selection. In
all, 64 percent said they were open to the idea of teaching creationism in
addition to evolution, while 38 percent favored replacing evolution with
creationism.
The poll was conducted July 7-17 by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life
and the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. The questions
about evolution were asked of 2,000 people. The margin of error was 2.5
percentage points.
John C. Green, a senior fellow at the Pew Forum, said he was surprised to see
that teaching both evolution and creationism was favored not only by
conservative Christians, but also by majorities of secular respondents, liberal
Democrats and those who accept the theory of natural selection. Mr. Green
called it a reflection of "American pragmatism."
"It's like they're saying, 'Some people see it this way, some see it that way,
so just teach it all and let the kids figure it out.' It seems like a nice
compromise, but it infuriates both the creationists and the scientists," said
Mr. Green, who is also a professor at the University of Akron in Ohio.
Eugenie C. Scott, the director of the National Center for Science Education and
a prominent defender of evolution, said the findings were not surprising because
"Americans react very positively to the fairness or equal time kind of
argument."
"In fact, it's the strongest thing that creationists have got going for them
because their science is dismal," Ms. Scott said. "But they do have
American culture on their side."
This year, the National Center for Science Education has tracked 70 new
controversies over evolution in 26 states, some in school districts, others in
the state legislatures.
President Bush joined the debate on Aug. 2, telling reporters that both
evolution and the theory of intelligent design should be taught in schools "so
people can understand what the debate is about."
Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee, the Republican leader, took the same position a
few weeks later.
Intelligent design, a descendant of creationism, is the belief that life is so
intricate that only a supreme being could have designed it.
The poll showed 41 percent of respondents wanted parents to have the primary say
over how evolution is taught, compared with 28 percent who said teachers and
scientists should decide and 21 percent who said school boards should.
Asked whether they believed creationism should be taught instead of evolution,
38 percent were in favor, and 49 percent were opposed.
More of those who believe in creationism said they were "very certain" of their
views (63 percent), compared with those who believe in evolution (32 percent).
The poll also asked about religion and politics, government financing of
religious charities, and gay men and lesbians in the military. Most of
these questions were asked of a smaller pool of 1,000 respondents, and the
margin of error was 2.5 percentage points, Pew researchers said.
The public's impression of the Democratic Party has changed in the last year,
the survey found. Only 29 percent of respondents said they viewed
Democrats as being "friendly toward religion," down from 40 percent in August of
2004. Meanwhile, 55 percent said the Republican Party was friendly toward
religion.
Luis E. Lugo, the director of the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, said:
"I think this is a continuation of the Republican Party's very successful use of
the values issue in the 2004 election, and the Democrats not being able up until
now to answer that successfully. Some of the more visible leaders, such as
Howard Dean and others, have reinforced that image of a secular party. Of
course, if you look at the Democratic Party, there's a large religious
constituency there."
Survey respondents agreed in nearly equal numbers that nonreligious liberals had
"too much control" over the Democratic Party (44 percent), and that religious
conservatives had too much control over the Republican Party (45 percent).
On religion-based charities, two-thirds of respondents favored allowing churches
and houses of worship to apply for government financing to provide social
services. But support for such financing declined from 75 percent in early
2001, when Mr. Bush rolled out his religion-based initiative.
On gay men and lesbians in the military, 58 percent of those polled said they
should be allowed to serve openly, a modest increase from 1994, when 52 percent
agreed. Strong opposition has fallen in that time, to 15 percent from 26
percent in 1994.
|
