|
|
Group Seeks to Clarify Gay Marriage RulingBy AP from the NYTimes on the Web, January 13, 2004BOSTON (AP) -- The leader of the state Senate says he will postpone next month's vote on a proposed constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages if the Supreme Judicial Court has not ruled by then on the constitutionality of civil unions. The Senate passed a civil unions bill last month, and asked the state's high court to determine whether it met the conditions of the court's November ruling that said gays and lesbians have the right to marry. Senate President Robert E. Travaglini will delay the Feb. 11 debate on the proposed constitutional amendment if the court has not ruled on the civil unions bill, Travaglini spokeswoman Ann Dufresne said Monday. ``The whole point of the advisory opinion is to seek guidance on the court's ruling, so it only makes sense not to pre-empt the court,'' Dufresne said. The law school deans of Yale and Stanford joined 88 other professors from the country's most prestigious legal institutions Monday in arguing that only full implementation of gay marriage will meet state constitutional muster. The professors, led by Harvard Law School constitutional expert Laurence Tribe, were one of several groups filing briefs with the Supreme Judicial Court. At least ten groups weighed in on whether civil union legislation under consideration by the state Senate would satisfy the court's ruling in November that gay couples were entitled to the benefits of marriage. ``Any equivocation by the justices ... not only would hurt the gay men and lesbians who are counting on the SJC to stick by what it said in November about same-sex marriage, but also would hurt the court itself, by undermining its hard-earned reputation for candor and integrity,'' said Tribe, one of 18 Harvard Law professors who signed the brief. A coalition of conservative groups, including the Massachusetts Catholic Conference, filed a brief denouncing the gay marriage decision. It called on the court to delay implementation of its landmark gay marriage decision until lawmakers and citizens have had the opportunity to vote on the issue. A constitutional amendment that will be considered by a joint session of the House and Senate Feb. 11 would define marriage as a union between one man and one woman. The soonest it could go to the voters for approval would be November 2006. Under the high court decision as it currently stands, the nation's first gay marriages could take place in Massachusetts on May 17. (Emphasis added.) |
Send mail to
email@gaypasg.org with questions or comments about this web site.
|