|
|
Bush called in his State of the Union address Tuesday night for a "national dialogue" on the subject, but also signaled his own conclusion: "If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process." In this ABCNEWS/Washington Post survey, 38 percent of Americans favor amending the U.S. Constitution to make it illegal for homosexual couples to marry, but 58 percent say, instead, that each state should make its own laws on gay marriage. That's not an endorsement of same-sex marriages — indeed most, 55 percent, say such marriages should be illegal. Instead it suggests a public judgment that the issue doesn't merit pre-empting the states and amending the U.S. Constitution. Compared to same-sex marriage, this poll finds a closer division in public views on gay civil unions — 51 percent opposed, but 46 percent in favor. Bush, in his State of the Union address, said, "Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage." If he was referring to government action, he lacks majority support on this point as well: Fifty-six percent say it should not be a role of the federal government to promote traditional marriage. It's been suggested that Bush raised the issue to win favor in his core support groups, and most in two such groups — conservatives and white evangelical Protestants — do favor a constitutional amendment. But majorities in other groups are opposed, including 52 percent of Republicans, some of whom may see it as a matter of states' rights.
Depends on How You Ask Measuring public views on a constitutional amendment is sensitive to how the subject is framed, including whether an alternative is offered. This poll asked, "Would you support amending the U.S. Constitution to make it illegal for homosexual couples to get married anywhere in the U.S., or should each state make its own laws on homosexual marriage?"
There have been two other basic approaches to the issue; one has found greater support for an amendment, the other has found greater opposition. An Associated Press poll in August asked, "Would you favor or oppose the amending of the Constitution to specify marriage should be between a man and a woman?" Similarly, a CBS News/New York Times poll last month asked, "Would you favor or oppose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would allow marriage only between a man and a woman?" These found 54 percent and 55 percent support for such an amendment. These questions don't specify that the amendment would make gay marriages illegal, or offer an alternative, such as state laws. They also may conflate views on two issues — one, the proposition that marriage should only be between a man and a woman; and the other, preferences on a constitutional amendment to make it so. In another approach, a Pew Research Center poll in October asked opponents of gay marriage if "the U.S. Constitution should be amended to ban gay marriage, or is it enough to prohibit gay marriage by law without changing the Constitution?" Respondents overwhelmingly preferred a legal mandate without a constitutional change. (This question doesn't specify that a nonconstitutional prohibition would have to be imposed state by state.) Separately, in September, an ABCNEWS poll asked opponents of gay marriage if it were "worth amending the U.S. Constitution … or not worth it?" A sizable majority said it wasn't worth it.
Debate These differences frame some terms of debate about an amendment. Supporters may appeal to basic opposition to same-sex marriage (the "sanctity of marriage" argument), while critics of an amendment may stress states' rights and ask whether the issue rises to the level of amending the Constitution. The debate could be contentious: On one hand, opposition to amending the Constitution is broadly spread across population groups. On the other hand, opposition to same-sex marriages appears broadly based as well. (The bar is already high for the amendment process itself: it requires two-thirds support in the U.S. House and Senate and ratification by three-fourths of the states).
While views on gay marriage can change, they seem stable at the moment — the 55 percent opposition in this poll is identical to its level in the ABCNEWS poll in September. The 51 percent opposition to gay civil unions also is identical in this poll, though support for civil unions is six points higher, while fewer are undecided. Groups Age, religious belief, ideology and political partisanship inform these views, and there's also a gender gap: Fifty-nine percent of men say same-sex marriage should be illegal, compared with 51 percent of women. Opponents of gay marriage include eight in 10 evangelical white Protestants, three in four senior citizens, three-quarters of conservatives and more than seven in 10 Republicans. Across the spectrum, same-sex marriage is supported by 56 percent of those under 40, two-thirds of those who profess no religion and nearly seven in 10 liberals.
On civil unions there's a larger gender gap: While 57 percent of men oppose same-sex civil unions, that declines to 45 percent of women. Support for civil unions peaks among younger people, college graduates, people living in the East and West, Democrats and liberals; opposition jumps among seniors, Southerners, Republicans, conservatives and evangelical white Protestants. Views on civil unions and same-sex marriages largely coincide. However, 14 percent of people who oppose gay marriage do support allowing same-sex couples to form civil unions.
Methodology This ABCNEWS/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone Jan. 15-18 among a random national sample of 1,036 adults. The results have a three-point error margin. Sampling, data collection and tabulation were done by TNS Intersearch of Horsham, Pa. Previous ABCNEWS polls can be found in our Poll Vault.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Send mail to
email@gaypasg.org with questions or comments about this web site.
|
